Best Firmware Development Service Providers

Developex vs eInfochips: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Developex (4.0/5) edges ahead of eInfochips (4.0/5) overall. Developex is the better choice for peripheral makers needing firmware plus configuration apps. eInfochips is the stronger option for large device programmes needing many engineers. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Developex vs eInfochips: head-to-head summary

Criterion Developex eInfochips
Founded 2001 1994
HQ Kyiv, Ukraine San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India)
Team size 201–500 1,000–5,000
Rating 4.0 / 5 4.0 / 5
Primary differentiator Firmware combined with drivers and companion desktop or mobile apps for consumer hardware Thousands of embedded engineers and broad chip-vendor partnerships, backed by Arrow
Pricing model Time & materials, dedicated team Time & materials, dedicated team, offshore development centre
Min. engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Primary tech stack C, C++, Qt C, C++, Embedded Linux
Industries served Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast Medical devices, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Aerospace & defence

Developex vs eInfochips: overview

Developex

Developex has written software for hardware companies since 2001, and its client list leans toward consumer electronics and peripheral makers who need firmware, drivers and the desktop or mobile utilities that configure their devices. The company is based in Kyiv with offices listed in Munich, Kraków and Zagreb, and directory estimates put the team at about 250 to 350 people. A company blog post put its embedded group at more than 30 developers (per company website; independently unverifiable). That makes firmware a real practice inside a larger custom-software business.

eInfochips

Arrow Electronics bought eInfochips in early 2018, when it had about 1,500 employees; it has since grown to well over 3,000 by directory counts. The company dates from 1994, has its main engineering base in Ahmedabad, India, and is headquartered in San Jose. Its services cover silicon design, embedded hardware and firmware, video and camera systems, device security and cloud, and it holds design partnerships with most major chip vendors. For firmware buyers it offers capacity and reference designs; the trade-off is a large-company engagement model.

Services and capabilities: Developex vs eInfochips

Capability Developex eInfochips
Bare-metal & RTOS firmware ✓ ✓
Embedded Linux & BSP ✓ ✓
Electronics & PCB design ✗ ✓
Wireless & IoT connectivity ✓ ✗
Secure boot & OTA ✗ ✓
FPGA development ✗ ✗
Firmware testing & HIL ✗ ✓
Dedicated team model ✓ ✓

Tech stack comparison: Developex vs eInfochips

Framework / platform Developex eInfochips
FreeRTOS ✓ ✓
Zephyr N/A N/A
Embedded Linux ✓ ✓
Yocto N/A ✓
AUTOSAR N/A N/A
STM32 N/A N/A
Nordic N/A N/A
NXP N/A ✓
FPGA N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Developex vs eInfochips

Criterion Developex eInfochips
Minimum engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Engagement models Dedicated team, Time & materials Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Developex vs eInfochips

Dimension Developex eInfochips
Best company size Startup to mid-market Mid-market to enterprise
Best industries Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast Medical devices, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics
Best use cases Writing firmware and a Windows configuration tool for a gaming peripheral, Maintaining firmware for an audio interface product line Staffing a 30-person firmware and validation team for a medical platform, Building a smart-camera product on a Qualcomm processor
Typical project type Dedicated team Dedicated team

Developex vs eInfochips: pros and cons

Developex
+ Long experience with USB peripherals, audio devices and their PC utilities
+ Can staff firmware, drivers and desktop apps from a single team
+ Eastern European rates
- Embedded is a minority of the business, so check engineers' firmware track records
- No hardware design
- Ukrainian delivery base may require continuity planning for some buyers
eInfochips
+ Can staff large teams quickly, including validation and test engineers
+ Camera, video and edge AI work on Qualcomm and NXP platforms
+ Arrow ownership helps with component supply and reference designs
- Owned by Arrow Electronics since 2018, so ask how silicon recommendations are made
- Large-company processes add overhead for small projects
- Engineer quality can vary between teams in a company this size

Who should choose Developex?

A typical fit: writing firmware and a Windows configuration tool for a gaming peripheral.

Firmware combined with drivers and companion desktop or mobile apps for consumer hardware. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast.

Who should choose eInfochips?

A typical fit: staffing a 30-person firmware and validation team for a medical platform.

Thousands of embedded engineers and broad chip-vendor partnerships, backed by Arrow. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Aerospace & defence.

Decision matrix: Developex vs eInfochips

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope eInfochips
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Developex
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Developex (Not disclosed) vs eInfochips (Not disclosed)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical eInfochips
You need engineers to extend your own firmware team Developex
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Developex vs eInfochips

Use case Developex fit eInfochips fit Winner
Writing firmware and a Windows configuration tool for a gaming peripheral Strong Limited Developex
Maintaining firmware for an audio interface product line Strong Limited Developex
Staffing a 30-person firmware and validation team for a medical platform Limited Strong eInfochips
Building a smart-camera product on a Qualcomm processor Limited Strong eInfochips
Fixed-price firmware build Limited Strong eInfochips
Extending an in-house firmware team Strong Strong Both

Verdict: Developex vs eInfochips

Developex (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Firmware combined with drivers and companion desktop or mobile apps for consumer hardware.

eInfochips (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need building a smart-camera product on a Qualcomm processor. If your situation matches that, eInfochips is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Developex vs eInfochips FAQ

Is Developex better than eInfochips?

Developex (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Developex's strongest advantage: long experience with USB peripherals, audio devices and their PC utilities. eInfochips's strongest advantage: can staff large teams quickly, including validation and test engineers.

How do Developex and eInfochips differ in pricing?

Developex uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing. eInfochips uses time & materials, dedicated team, offshore development centre pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Developex or eInfochips?

eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Developex and eInfochips?

Developex's primary differentiator is: firmware combined with drivers and companion desktop or mobile apps for consumer hardware. eInfochips's primary differentiator is: thousands of embedded engineers and broad chip-vendor partnerships, backed by Arrow. They also differ in team size (201–500 vs 1,000–5,000), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast vs Medical devices, Industrial IoT).

Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.