Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of ByteSnap Design (4.3/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected devices needing firmware and electronics together. ByteSnap Design is the stronger option for UK companies needing electronics and firmware from one team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2008 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Birmingham, UK |
| Team size | 200+ | 11–50 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status | Small UK team covering PCB design, Linux and Android bring-up, and MCU firmware |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, time & materials, dedicated team | Fixed project, time & materials |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, FreeRTOS | C, C++, Embedded Linux |
| Industries served | Medical devices, Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Logistics & transportation, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics | Medical devices, Energy & EV charging, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics |
Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions takes a device from schematic to field updates under one roof: electrical engineering, bare-metal and RTOS firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA programming, GUI work, connectivity and edge AI. The company started in Lviv in 2007, now has more than 200 people, and also runs offices in Hamburg, London and Kraków. Its firmware practice works across STM32, NXP i.MX and LPC, Microchip PIC and SAM, Nordic and Espressif parts, with FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS and VxWorks listed in its stack, and it holds partner status with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics. Named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink and Bosch Rexroth. Processes are certified to ISO 27001 and ISO 9001, and an in-house lab with oscilloscopes, spectrum analyzers and evaluation kits is used to validate firmware on real hardware before it ships.
ByteSnap Design
Graeme Wintle and Dunstan Power founded ByteSnap Design in Birmingham in 2008, and both still run it from Park Point in Longbridge. With about 40 people, it is small by the standards of this list but covers a wide technical spread: schematic and PCB design, embedded Linux and Android board bring-up, RTOS firmware and touch interfaces. It is a Silicon Labs certified design partner and an Analog Devices partner. Trade press has linked recent growth to medical device work, alongside EV charging and industrial clients.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✓ | ✗ |
| FPGA development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| Yocto | N/A | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| Nordic | ✓ | N/A |
| NXP | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Medical devices, Automotive, Energy & EV charging | Medical devices, Energy & EV charging, Industrial IoT |
| Best use cases | Porting medical-device firmware to a new STM32 family while keeping power consumption down, Auditing and refactoring unstable connectivity firmware on ESP32 or Nordic parts | Designing a Linux-based EV charger controller board and its software, Building a Silicon Labs Zigbee smart-home device |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | One team covers schematics, PCB layout, MCU firmware, cloud back end and the companion app, so integration problems surface inside a single project plan |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, with secure boot, image signing and OTA rollback offered as standard firmware work items |
| + | Partner status with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics gives earlier access to silicon support and reference designs |
| + | Edge AI experience runs from sensor integration and DSP to on-device inference and computer vision |
| + | In-house lab lets the team validate firmware against real boards and RF conditions before the client receives a build |
| + | All intellectual property rights transfer to the client, across consulting, team-extension and full-product engagements |
| - | Mass production is not handled in-house; the team supports a product through development and maintenance but does not manufacture finished devices |
| - | Regulatory certification is not obtained on the client's behalf; Lemberg supplies the technical documentation and engineering support for approvals |
| - | Broad scope means a buyer who only needs a single low-level driver may be paying for capabilities they will not use |
| ByteSnap Design | |
|---|---|
| + | Founder-led team where senior engineers stay involved in delivery |
| + | Covers both MCU firmware and Linux or Android on application processors |
| + | Silicon Labs certified design partner, useful for Zigbee, Thread and BLE products |
| + | Offers free design clinics, which lowers the cost of an initial technical review |
| - | Around 40 people limits capacity for multiple large programmes at once |
| - | UK pricing is higher than offshore alternatives |
| - | Less visible experience in automotive functional safety than larger engineering firms |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: porting medical-device firmware to a new STM32 family while keeping power consumption down.
Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Logistics & transportation, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics.
Who should choose ByteSnap Design?
A typical fit: designing a Linux-based EV charger controller board and its software.
Small UK team covering PCB design, Linux and Android bring-up, and MCU firmware. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Energy & EV charging, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not disclosed) vs ByteSnap Design (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | ByteSnap Design fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porting medical-device firmware to a new STM32 family while keeping power consumption down | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Auditing and refactoring unstable connectivity firmware on ESP32 or Nordic parts | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Designing a Linux-based EV charger controller board and its software | Limited | Strong | ByteSnap Design |
| Building a Silicon Labs Zigbee smart-home device | Limited | Strong | ByteSnap Design |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Strong | Strong | Both |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status.
ByteSnap Design (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need building a Silicon Labs Zigbee smart-home device. If your situation matches that, ByteSnap Design is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than ByteSnap Design?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: one team covers schematics, PCB layout, MCU firmware, cloud back end and the companion app, so integration problems surface inside a single project plan. ByteSnap Design's strongest advantage: founder-led team where senior engineers stay involved in delivery.
How do Lemberg Solutions and ByteSnap Design differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses fixed project, time & materials, dedicated team pricing. ByteSnap Design uses fixed project, time & materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or ByteSnap Design?
ByteSnap Design is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and ByteSnap Design?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status. ByteSnap Design's primary differentiator is: small UK team covering PCB design, Linux and Android bring-up, and MCU firmware. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 11–50), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Medical devices, Automotive vs Medical devices, Energy & EV charging).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.