eInfochips vs ScienceSoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
eInfochips (4.0/5) edges ahead of ScienceSoft (3.7/5) overall. eInfochips is the better choice for large device programmes needing many engineers. ScienceSoft is the stronger option for healthcare IoT platforms with light firmware needs. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs ScienceSoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 1989 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | McKinney, Texas, USA |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 750+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Thousands of embedded engineers and broad chip-vendor partnerships, backed by Arrow | Healthcare IT and IoT platform experience, with security testing in-house |
| Pricing model | Time & materials, dedicated team, offshore development centre | Fixed project, time & materials |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, Embedded Linux | C, C++, FreeRTOS |
| Industries served | Medical devices, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Aerospace & defence | Medical devices, Industrial IoT |
eInfochips vs ScienceSoft: overview
eInfochips
Arrow Electronics bought eInfochips in early 2018, when it had about 1,500 employees; it has since grown to well over 3,000 by directory counts. The company dates from 1994, has its main engineering base in Ahmedabad, India, and is headquartered in San Jose. Its services cover silicon design, embedded hardware and firmware, video and camera systems, device security and cloud, and it holds design partnerships with most major chip vendors. For firmware buyers it offers capacity and reference designs; the trade-off is a large-company engagement model.
ScienceSoft
ScienceSoft traces its origins to a cooperative founded in 1989 and is now headquartered in McKinney, Texas, with about 750 staff. It has offered IoT services since 2011, with projects such as the AKLOS Health physiotherapy platform, and lists embedded software among its services. Most of its revenue comes from healthcare IT, finance IT, data analytics and security testing. For firmware buyers it is mainly useful when the device side is small and the larger job is the platform around it.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
| Capability | eInfochips | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✓ | ✗ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| Yocto | ✓ | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| Nordic | N/A | N/A |
| NXP | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
| Criterion | eInfochips | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
| Dimension | eInfochips | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Medical devices, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics | Medical devices, Industrial IoT |
| Best use cases | Staffing a 30-person firmware and validation team for a medical platform, Building a smart-camera product on a Qualcomm processor | Building a remote patient monitoring platform with BLE device integration, Security testing an IoT product's cloud and mobile components |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
eInfochips vs ScienceSoft: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff large teams quickly, including validation and test engineers |
| + | Camera, video and edge AI work on Qualcomm and NXP platforms |
| + | Arrow ownership helps with component supply and reference designs |
| - | Owned by Arrow Electronics since 2018, so ask how silicon recommendations are made |
| - | Large-company processes add overhead for small projects |
| - | Engineer quality can vary between teams in a company this size |
| ScienceSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Long healthcare IT history useful for connected medical platforms |
| + | In-house security testing team |
| + | Fixed-price proposals available for well-defined scopes |
| - | Firmware is a minor service line, and public embedded case studies are few |
| - | No hardware design |
| - | Better suited to the platform around a device than to the device itself |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: staffing a 30-person firmware and validation team for a medical platform.
Thousands of embedded engineers and broad chip-vendor partnerships, backed by Arrow. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Aerospace & defence.
Who should choose ScienceSoft?
A typical fit: building a remote patient monitoring platform with BLE device integration.
Healthcare IT and IoT platform experience, with security testing in-house. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Industrial IoT.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not disclosed) vs ScienceSoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | eInfochips |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
| Use case | eInfochips fit | ScienceSoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing a 30-person firmware and validation team for a medical platform | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Building a smart-camera product on a Qualcomm processor | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Building a remote patient monitoring platform with BLE device integration | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Security testing an IoT product's cloud and mobile components | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Strong | Strong | Both |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
eInfochips (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Thousands of embedded engineers and broad chip-vendor partnerships, backed by Arrow.
ScienceSoft (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need security testing an IoT product's cloud and mobile components. If your situation matches that, ScienceSoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs ScienceSoft FAQ
Is eInfochips better than ScienceSoft?
eInfochips (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: can staff large teams quickly, including validation and test engineers. ScienceSoft's strongest advantage: long healthcare IT history useful for connected medical platforms.
How do eInfochips and ScienceSoft differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses time & materials, dedicated team, offshore development centre pricing. ScienceSoft uses fixed project, time & materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or ScienceSoft?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and ScienceSoft?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: thousands of embedded engineers and broad chip-vendor partnerships, backed by Arrow. ScienceSoft's primary differentiator is: healthcare IT and IoT platform experience, with security testing in-house. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 750+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Medical devices, Industrial IoT vs Medical devices, Industrial IoT).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.