eInfochips vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
eInfochips (4.0/5) edges ahead of Very (3.8/5) overall. eInfochips is the better choice for large device programmes needing many engineers. Very is the stronger option for US companies building a first connected product. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 2011 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | USA (fully distributed) |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Thousands of embedded engineers and broad chip-vendor partnerships, backed by Arrow | Product-strategy-led IoT development with Nerves and Elixir experience |
| Pricing model | Time & materials, dedicated team, offshore development centre | Time & materials, fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, Embedded Linux | C, Elixir, Nerves |
| Industries served | Medical devices, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Aerospace & defence | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging |
eInfochips vs Very: overview
eInfochips
Arrow Electronics bought eInfochips in early 2018, when it had about 1,500 employees; it has since grown to well over 3,000 by directory counts. The company dates from 1994, has its main engineering base in Ahmedabad, India, and is headquartered in San Jose. Its services cover silicon design, embedded hardware and firmware, video and camera systems, device security and cloud, and it holds design partnerships with most major chip vendors. For firmware buyers it offers capacity and reference designs; the trade-off is a large-company engagement model.
Very
Very is a US IoT engineering firm that grew out of a design and development agency founded in 2011 and now works as a distributed team, with its earlier base in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Directory listings put its size at 51 to 200 people. It builds IoT products across hardware engineering, firmware, mobile apps and data, and it hired a co-author of the Nerves project, which runs Elixir on embedded Linux. Reviews mention hardware, firmware, React Native and AI feature work, so firmware is one part of a broader product offer.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs Very
| Capability | eInfochips | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✓ | ✗ |
| FPGA development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs Very
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | Very |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| Yocto | ✓ | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| Nordic | N/A | ✓ |
| NXP | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs Very
| Criterion | eInfochips | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs Very
| Dimension | eInfochips | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Medical devices, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging |
| Best use cases | Staffing a 30-person firmware and validation team for a medical platform, Building a smart-camera product on a Qualcomm processor | Taking a first IoT product from concept to pilot, Building Nerves-based device software on embedded Linux |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
eInfochips vs Very: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff large teams quickly, including validation and test engineers |
| + | Camera, video and edge AI work on Qualcomm and NXP platforms |
| + | Arrow ownership helps with component supply and reference designs |
| - | Owned by Arrow Electronics since 2018, so ask how silicon recommendations are made |
| - | Large-company processes add overhead for small projects |
| - | Engineer quality can vary between teams in a company this size |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | Combines product strategy, design and engineering for teams new to hardware |
| + | Nerves experience is rare and useful for Elixir-based device software |
| + | Delivers the device, app and data platform together |
| - | Firmware is one part of a product agency offer |
| - | US rates without a lower-cost offshore option |
| - | Office location and headcount details vary between sources |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: staffing a 30-person firmware and validation team for a medical platform.
Thousands of embedded engineers and broad chip-vendor partnerships, backed by Arrow. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Aerospace & defence.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: taking a first IoT product from concept to pilot.
Product-strategy-led IoT development with Nerves and Elixir experience. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not disclosed) vs Very (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | eInfochips |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs Very
| Use case | eInfochips fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing a 30-person firmware and validation team for a medical platform | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Building a smart-camera product on a Qualcomm processor | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Taking a first IoT product from concept to pilot | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Building Nerves-based device software on embedded Linux | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Strong | Strong | Both |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: eInfochips vs Very
eInfochips (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Thousands of embedded engineers and broad chip-vendor partnerships, backed by Arrow.
Very (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need building Nerves-based device software on embedded Linux. If your situation matches that, Very is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs Very FAQ
Is eInfochips better than Very?
eInfochips (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: can staff large teams quickly, including validation and test engineers. Very's strongest advantage: combines product strategy, design and engineering for teams new to hardware.
How do eInfochips and Very differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses time & materials, dedicated team, offshore development centre pricing. Very uses time & materials, fixed project pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or Very?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and Very?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: thousands of embedded engineers and broad chip-vendor partnerships, backed by Arrow. Very's primary differentiator is: product-strategy-led IoT development with Nerves and Elixir experience. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Medical devices, Industrial IoT vs Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.