Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Luxoft (3.8/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected devices needing firmware and electronics together. Luxoft is the stronger option for automotive cockpit and ADAS software programmes. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2000 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Zug, Switzerland |
| Team size | 200+ | 15,000+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status | Automotive embedded and cockpit software practice inside DXC |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, time & materials, dedicated team | Time & materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, FreeRTOS | C++, AUTOSAR, QNX |
| Industries served | Medical devices, Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Logistics & transportation, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics | Automotive, Telecom & broadcast |
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions takes a device from schematic to field updates under one roof: electrical engineering, bare-metal and RTOS firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA programming, GUI work, connectivity and edge AI. The company started in Lviv in 2007, now has more than 200 people, and also runs offices in Hamburg, London and Kraków. Its firmware practice works across STM32, NXP i.MX and LPC, Microchip PIC and SAM, Nordic and Espressif parts, with FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS and VxWorks listed in its stack, and it holds partner status with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics. Named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink and Bosch Rexroth. Processes are certified to ISO 27001 and ISO 9001, and an in-house lab with oscilloscopes, spectrum analyzers and evaluation kits is used to validate firmware on real hardware before it ships.
Luxoft
Luxoft started in Moscow in 2000, is now headquartered in Zug, Switzerland, and has been part of DXC Technology since 2019. Its automotive business, marketed as DXC Luxoft Automotive, works on embedded systems, cockpit and infotainment software, ADAS and simulation, and grew through acquisitions including Objective GmbH in 2018 and CMORE Automotive in 2020. Group headcount estimates sit between about 13,000 and 18,000. Embedded MCU firmware outside automotive is not where it competes.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✓ | ✗ |
| FPGA development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| Yocto | N/A | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | ✓ |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| Nordic | ✓ | N/A |
| NXP | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials | Dedicated team, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Medical devices, Automotive, Energy & EV charging | Automotive, Telecom & broadcast |
| Best use cases | Porting medical-device firmware to a new STM32 family while keeping power consumption down, Auditing and refactoring unstable connectivity firmware on ESP32 or Nordic parts | Developing digital cockpit software for a vehicle platform, Building simulation and validation tooling for ADAS |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | One team covers schematics, PCB layout, MCU firmware, cloud back end and the companion app, so integration problems surface inside a single project plan |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, with secure boot, image signing and OTA rollback offered as standard firmware work items |
| + | Partner status with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics gives earlier access to silicon support and reference designs |
| + | Edge AI experience runs from sensor integration and DSP to on-device inference and computer vision |
| + | In-house lab lets the team validate firmware against real boards and RF conditions before the client receives a build |
| + | All intellectual property rights transfer to the client, across consulting, team-extension and full-product engagements |
| - | Mass production is not handled in-house; the team supports a product through development and maintenance but does not manufacture finished devices |
| - | Regulatory certification is not obtained on the client's behalf; Lemberg supplies the technical documentation and engineering support for approvals |
| - | Broad scope means a buyer who only needs a single low-level driver may be paying for capabilities they will not use |
| Luxoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Long track record with automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers |
| + | Acquisitions added German automotive engineering capacity |
| + | Can run large, multi-site programmes |
| - | Owned by DXC since 2019, and its focus outside automotive embedded is limited |
| - | Not a practical choice for small MCU firmware projects |
| - | Delivery footprint changed significantly after 2022; confirm current team locations |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: porting medical-device firmware to a new STM32 family while keeping power consumption down.
Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Logistics & transportation, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics.
Who should choose Luxoft?
A typical fit: developing digital cockpit software for a vehicle platform.
Automotive embedded and cockpit software practice inside DXC. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Telecom & broadcast.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not disclosed) vs Luxoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Luxoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porting medical-device firmware to a new STM32 family while keeping power consumption down | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Auditing and refactoring unstable connectivity firmware on ESP32 or Nordic parts | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Developing digital cockpit software for a vehicle platform | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| Building simulation and validation tooling for ADAS | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status.
Luxoft (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need building simulation and validation tooling for ADAS. If your situation matches that, Luxoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Luxoft FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Luxoft?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: one team covers schematics, PCB layout, MCU firmware, cloud back end and the companion app, so integration problems surface inside a single project plan. Luxoft's strongest advantage: long track record with automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Luxoft differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses fixed project, time & materials, dedicated team pricing. Luxoft uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Luxoft?
Luxoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Luxoft?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status. Luxoft's primary differentiator is: automotive embedded and cockpit software practice inside DXC. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 15,000+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Medical devices, Automotive vs Automotive, Telecom & broadcast).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.