Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Timesys (4.1/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected devices needing firmware and electronics together. Timesys is the stronger option for linux devices facing SBOM and security compliance. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1996 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status | Embedded Linux services combined with Vigiles vulnerability tracking |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, time & materials, dedicated team | Fixed project, time & materials, software subscription |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, FreeRTOS | Embedded Linux, Yocto, Buildroot |
| Industries served | Medical devices, Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Logistics & transportation, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Aerospace & defence |
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions takes a device from schematic to field updates under one roof: electrical engineering, bare-metal and RTOS firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA programming, GUI work, connectivity and edge AI. The company started in Lviv in 2007, now has more than 200 people, and also runs offices in Hamburg, London and Kraków. Its firmware practice works across STM32, NXP i.MX and LPC, Microchip PIC and SAM, Nordic and Espressif parts, with FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS and VxWorks listed in its stack, and it holds partner status with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics. Named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink and Bosch Rexroth. Processes are certified to ISO 27001 and ISO 9001, and an in-house lab with oscilloscopes, spectrum analyzers and evaluation kits is used to validate firmware on real hardware before it ships.
Timesys
Timesys came out of Pittsburgh in the mid-1990s, with founders tied to Carnegie Mellon University, and shipped one of the first real-time embedded Linux distributions. Its business now combines engineering services for open-source embedded software with Vigiles, a tool that tracks vulnerabilities in device software bills of materials. Lynx Software Technologies acquired Timesys in December 2023 and said all Timesys products would remain supported. The firm suits Linux-based devices that have to meet the security and SBOM rules arriving in the US and EU.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| Yocto | N/A | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| Nordic | ✓ | N/A |
| NXP | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials | Consulting, Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Medical devices, Automotive, Energy & EV charging | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Aerospace & defence |
| Best use cases | Porting medical-device firmware to a new STM32 family while keeping power consumption down, Auditing and refactoring unstable connectivity firmware on ESP32 or Nordic parts | Hardening an i.MX-based medical device's Linux image and producing an SBOM, Setting up ongoing CVE monitoring for a fleet of industrial gateways |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Consulting |
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | One team covers schematics, PCB layout, MCU firmware, cloud back end and the companion app, so integration problems surface inside a single project plan |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, with secure boot, image signing and OTA rollback offered as standard firmware work items |
| + | Partner status with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics gives earlier access to silicon support and reference designs |
| + | Edge AI experience runs from sensor integration and DSP to on-device inference and computer vision |
| + | In-house lab lets the team validate firmware against real boards and RF conditions before the client receives a build |
| + | All intellectual property rights transfer to the client, across consulting, team-extension and full-product engagements |
| - | Mass production is not handled in-house; the team supports a product through development and maintenance but does not manufacture finished devices |
| - | Regulatory certification is not obtained on the client's behalf; Lemberg supplies the technical documentation and engineering support for approvals |
| - | Broad scope means a buyer who only needs a single low-level driver may be paying for capabilities they will not use |
| Timesys | |
|---|---|
| + | Vigiles gives continuous CVE monitoring for the Linux image after launch |
| + | Long history with Yocto, Buildroot and secure boot on common application processors |
| + | Practical help with SBOM requirements under US and EU cybersecurity rules |
| - | Acquired by Lynx Software in 2023; product focus may shift toward Lynx's hypervisor and RTOS line |
| - | Little bare-metal MCU firmware work |
| - | No hardware design services |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: porting medical-device firmware to a new STM32 family while keeping power consumption down.
Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Logistics & transportation, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics.
Who should choose Timesys?
A typical fit: hardening an i.MX-based medical device's Linux image and producing an SBOM.
Embedded Linux services combined with Vigiles vulnerability tracking. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Aerospace & defence.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not disclosed) vs Timesys (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Timesys fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porting medical-device firmware to a new STM32 family while keeping power consumption down | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Auditing and refactoring unstable connectivity firmware on ESP32 or Nordic parts | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Hardening an i.MX-based medical device's Linux image and producing an SBOM | Limited | Strong | Timesys |
| Setting up ongoing CVE monitoring for a fleet of industrial gateways | Limited | Strong | Timesys |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Strong | Strong | Both |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status.
Timesys (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need setting up ongoing CVE monitoring for a fleet of industrial gateways. If your situation matches that, Timesys is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: one team covers schematics, PCB layout, MCU firmware, cloud back end and the companion app, so integration problems surface inside a single project plan. Timesys's strongest advantage: vigiles gives continuous CVE monitoring for the Linux image after launch.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Timesys differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses fixed project, time & materials, dedicated team pricing. Timesys uses fixed project, time & materials, software subscription pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Timesys?
Timesys is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status. Timesys's primary differentiator is: embedded Linux services combined with Vigiles vulnerability tracking. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Medical devices, Automotive vs Industrial IoT, Medical devices).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.