Luxoft vs ScienceSoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Luxoft (3.8/5) edges ahead of ScienceSoft (3.7/5) overall. Luxoft is the better choice for automotive cockpit and ADAS software programmes. ScienceSoft is the stronger option for healthcare IoT platforms with light firmware needs. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Luxoft vs ScienceSoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Luxoft | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 1989 |
| HQ | Zug, Switzerland | McKinney, Texas, USA |
| Team size | 15,000+ | 750+ |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Automotive embedded and cockpit software practice inside DXC | Healthcare IT and IoT platform experience, with security testing in-house |
| Pricing model | Time & materials, dedicated team | Fixed project, time & materials |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C++, AUTOSAR, QNX | C, C++, FreeRTOS |
| Industries served | Automotive, Telecom & broadcast | Medical devices, Industrial IoT |
Luxoft vs ScienceSoft: overview
Luxoft
Luxoft started in Moscow in 2000, is now headquartered in Zug, Switzerland, and has been part of DXC Technology since 2019. Its automotive business, marketed as DXC Luxoft Automotive, works on embedded systems, cockpit and infotainment software, ADAS and simulation, and grew through acquisitions including Objective GmbH in 2018 and CMORE Automotive in 2020. Group headcount estimates sit between about 13,000 and 18,000. Embedded MCU firmware outside automotive is not where it competes.
ScienceSoft
ScienceSoft traces its origins to a cooperative founded in 1989 and is now headquartered in McKinney, Texas, with about 750 staff. It has offered IoT services since 2011, with projects such as the AKLOS Health physiotherapy platform, and lists embedded software among its services. Most of its revenue comes from healthcare IT, finance IT, data analytics and security testing. For firmware buyers it is mainly useful when the device side is small and the larger job is the platform around it.
Services and capabilities: Luxoft vs ScienceSoft
| Capability | Luxoft | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✓ | ✗ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✗ | ✓ |
| FPGA development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Luxoft vs ScienceSoft
| Framework / platform | Luxoft | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | ✓ |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| Yocto | N/A | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| Nordic | N/A | N/A |
| NXP | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Luxoft vs ScienceSoft
| Criterion | Luxoft | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time & materials | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Luxoft vs ScienceSoft
| Dimension | Luxoft | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive, Telecom & broadcast | Medical devices, Industrial IoT |
| Best use cases | Developing digital cockpit software for a vehicle platform, Building simulation and validation tooling for ADAS | Building a remote patient monitoring platform with BLE device integration, Security testing an IoT product's cloud and mobile components |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Luxoft vs ScienceSoft: pros and cons
| Luxoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Long track record with automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers |
| + | Acquisitions added German automotive engineering capacity |
| + | Can run large, multi-site programmes |
| - | Owned by DXC since 2019, and its focus outside automotive embedded is limited |
| - | Not a practical choice for small MCU firmware projects |
| - | Delivery footprint changed significantly after 2022; confirm current team locations |
| ScienceSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Long healthcare IT history useful for connected medical platforms |
| + | In-house security testing team |
| + | Fixed-price proposals available for well-defined scopes |
| - | Firmware is a minor service line, and public embedded case studies are few |
| - | No hardware design |
| - | Better suited to the platform around a device than to the device itself |
Who should choose Luxoft?
A typical fit: developing digital cockpit software for a vehicle platform.
Automotive embedded and cockpit software practice inside DXC. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Telecom & broadcast.
Who should choose ScienceSoft?
A typical fit: building a remote patient monitoring platform with BLE device integration.
Healthcare IT and IoT platform experience, with security testing in-house. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Industrial IoT.
Decision matrix: Luxoft vs ScienceSoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | ScienceSoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Luxoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Luxoft (Not disclosed) vs ScienceSoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Luxoft |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Luxoft |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Luxoft vs ScienceSoft
| Use case | Luxoft fit | ScienceSoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Developing digital cockpit software for a vehicle platform | Strong | Limited | Luxoft |
| Building simulation and validation tooling for ADAS | Strong | Limited | Luxoft |
| Building a remote patient monitoring platform with BLE device integration | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Security testing an IoT product's cloud and mobile components | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Luxoft vs ScienceSoft
Luxoft (3.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Automotive embedded and cockpit software practice inside DXC.
ScienceSoft (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need security testing an IoT product's cloud and mobile components. If your situation matches that, ScienceSoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Luxoft vs ScienceSoft FAQ
Is Luxoft better than ScienceSoft?
Luxoft (3.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Luxoft's strongest advantage: long track record with automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers. ScienceSoft's strongest advantage: long healthcare IT history useful for connected medical platforms.
How do Luxoft and ScienceSoft differ in pricing?
Luxoft uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing. ScienceSoft uses fixed project, time & materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Luxoft or ScienceSoft?
Luxoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Luxoft and ScienceSoft?
Luxoft's primary differentiator is: automotive embedded and cockpit software practice inside DXC. ScienceSoft's primary differentiator is: healthcare IT and IoT platform experience, with security testing in-house. They also differ in team size (15,000+ vs 750+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Automotive, Telecom & broadcast vs Medical devices, Industrial IoT).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.